<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Seb Patrick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 14:03:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Weezerology Part Two: The Butterfly Effect</title>
		<link>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2013/02/weezerology-part-two-the-butterfly-effect/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2013/02/weezerology-part-two-the-butterfly-effect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 14:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seb Patrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bloggery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weezerology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/?p=945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Continuing &#8211; somewhat belatedly, sorry &#8211; my series of articles revisiting every one of Weezer&#8217;s songs throughout their career from 1992 to the present. Each album &#8211; or set of tracks &#8211; listened to and written about in order, no song covered more than once (in most cases), full-band releases or demos only (in most [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-766" title="Weezerology" src="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/weezerology.jpg" alt="" width="477" height="261" /><br />
<em>Continuing &#8211; somewhat belatedly, sorry &#8211; my series of articles revisiting every one of Weezer&#8217;s songs throughout their career from 1992 to the present. Each album &#8211; or set of tracks &#8211; listened to and written about in order, no song covered more than once (in most cases), full-band releases or demos only (in most cases). Introduction and more info <a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/06/weezerology-an-introduction/">here</a>, and part one &#8211; covering the years 1992-1995 &#8211; <a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/06/weezerology-part-one-into-the-blue/">here</a>.</em></p>
<p><span id="more-945"></span></p>
<h3>4. Songs From The Black Hole Demos</h3>
<p><strong>1. Blast Off! 2. Who You Callin’ Bitch? 3. Oh Jonas. 4. Please Remember. 5. Come to My Pod. 6. Oh No This Is Not For Me. 7. Superfriend. 8. She’s Had A Girl. 9. Dude, We’re Finally Landing (Good News!) 10. What Is This I Find? 11. Now I Finally See. 12. You Won’t Get With Me Tonight. 13. Longtime Sunshine.</strong><br />
<em>Recorded January 1994 &#8211; August 1995 by Cuomo/Bell/Sharp/Wilson.</em></p>
<p>In the aftermath of <em>The Blue Album</em>&#8216;s enormous &#8211; and, as likely as not, unexpected &#8211; success, Rivers and Weezer actually tried two distinct approaches when it came to the task of dealing with Second Album Syndrome. They differed hugely on the surface, although &#8211; as we&#8217;ll see &#8211; they shared more in common than might initially appear.</p>
<p>The First Big Idea was Rivers&#8217; plan to write a sprawling sci-fi-themed &#8220;rock opera&#8221; concept album. Named <em>Songs From The Black Hole</em>, the album would tell the story of five young space cadets on a mission to the stars &#8211; with each of the five characters (three male, two female) voiced either by members of Weezer or friends of the band. If that sounds batshit insane, it&#8217;s probably because it was &#8211; but it also might just have been something brilliant.</p>
<p>Rivers started work on <em>Songs From The Black Hole</em> in late 1994, and in the first half of 1995 recorded a batch of demos. Intending for the songs to run into one-another in order to tell the story, in all he recorded nearly twenty tracks &#8211; but as a number of them were deliberately shorter sections of under a minute, the total length of the demo album, clocking in at just under thirty-five minutes, works out at around half the likely length of the finished product.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, it&#8217;s possible to get a sense from these demos &#8211; which remained buried away from fandom for around a decade, but have more recently emerged first online, and then via Rivers&#8217; <em>Alone</em> series of solo rarity compilations &#8211; how the album would have turned out from a song-writing point of view, if not stylistically (as, with the exception of songs that would later be re-used, Rivers&#8217; raw demos are likely far away from the heavily-produced, multi-layered intent of the final product). Easily the most famous track &#8211; perhaps because it leaked first &#8211; is the intended opener, &#8220;Blast Off&#8221;:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2013/02/weezerology-part-two-the-butterfly-effect/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p>While the final version would almost certainly have been drenched in keyboards, this recording does show how Rivers was already moving towards a heavier rock sound than on <em>Blue</em>. The style of riff employed is one that was fairly new to Weezer at the time, but can be seen showing up frequently at later points in their career &#8211; indeed, the otherwise-lamentable &#8220;Beverly Hills&#8221; doesn&#8217;t feel a million miles away from it.</p>
<p>Of course, this version &#8211; like all the other demos &#8211; suffers from the fact that Rivers is singing the parts of all the lead characters. This is also evident on the otherwise-magnificent &#8220;You Won&#8217;t Get With Me Tonight&#8221; &#8211; probably the most complete, individual pop song on the album as it exists &#8211; on which we therefore have to imagine a female singer like Rachel Haden playing one of the duetting roles:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2013/02/weezerology-part-two-the-butterfly-effect/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p>Frenetic, ridiculously catchy and hugely enjoyable, &#8220;YWGWMT&#8221; (along with the long-time fan favourite track &#8220;Superfriend&#8221;) is among the strongest evidence for just how good <em>SFTBH</em> might have been. By the same token, none of these superficially straightforward pop songs really show off the more esoteric nature of the project. Aside from the shorter vignettes &#8211; which are highly variable in quality in their demo form &#8211; perhaps the song that does this the best is one of the few to feature the rest of the band on its recording. &#8220;Longtime Sunshine&#8221; exists in various demo versions &#8211; usually just recorded by Rivers &#8211; but the version released as a bonus track on the <em>Pinkerton</em> deluxe edition seems closest to the one that might have wound up being <em>Black Hole</em>&#8216;s final track:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2013/02/weezerology-part-two-the-butterfly-effect/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p>The closing sequence, in which various band members &#8211; each, we can presume, playing their &#8220;characters&#8221; &#8211; reprise a selection of different songs from earlier in the album, overlaid and harmonised, is somewhat raw in its execution here; but nevertheless, it&#8217;s pretty clear that the intended final result is something pretty exciting and unlike anything the band had tried before. We can reasonably expect that there would have been plenty more of that sort of thing dotted throughout the record.</p>
<p><em>Songs From The Black Hole</em> was dead as a project by the time Rivers enrolled at Harvard university in Autumn 1995 &#8211; losing interest in the idea and shifting towards a different style of songwriting and recording. Its influence on the band wasn&#8217;t completely lost, however &#8211; as we&#8217;ll see, a number of tracks that started out as <em>SFTBH</em> cuts (and hence missing from the above tracklist) would appear later, and fan interest in the album burned throughout the late 2000s to the extent that a huge array of self-put-together takes on the album (some limiting themselves to the demo album alone, others working in album tracks and even songs by Matt Sharp&#8217;s side-project The Rentals) exist online.</p>
<p>Weezer, though, had other business to be getting on with. Like, for example, one of the greatest albums in alt-rock history&#8230;</p>
<h3>5. Pinkerton</h3>
<p><strong>1. Tired of Sex. 2. Getchoo. 3. No Other One. 4. Why Bother? 5. Across the Sea. 6. The Good Life. 7. El Scorcho. 8. Pink Triangle. 9. Falling For You. 10. Butterfly.</strong><br />
<em>Recorded September 1995-June 1996 by Cuomo/Bell/Sharp/Wilson. Self-produced. Released September 1996.</em></p>
<p>If you chart Weezer&#8217;s progression from 1994 to 1996 with the inclusion of <em>Songs From The Black Hole</em> &#8211; which, of course, our retrospective position allows us to do &#8211; then it&#8217;s not entirely difficult to see where <em>Pinkerton</em> comes from. If you don&#8217;t have the benefit of that context, however, then it&#8217;s fair to say that hearing &#8220;Tired of Sex&#8221; as the first new track since the <em>Blue Album</em> is&#8230; well, it&#8217;s something of a shock. A shock that punches you square in the bollocks. If you have them.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2013/02/weezerology-part-two-the-butterfly-effect/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p>Maybe this sudden, jarring shift in style explains why <em>Pinkerton</em> was so badly reviewed on release &#8211; and it was, to the extent that <em>Rolling Stone</em> included it in their &#8220;Worst Albums of 1996&#8243; list. Except it doesn&#8217;t explain it, really, because surely only somebody <em>without ears</em> could call <em>Pinkerton</em> anything other than a masterpiece.</p>
<p>Perhaps, for some, the raw crunch of those first couple of tracks &#8211; the astonishingly good &#8220;Tired of Sex&#8221; with its never-again-matched-by-the-band guitar solo, and the admittedly slightly less astonishingly good &#8220;Getchoo&#8221; &#8211; were just too much of a hurdle to get over. Which is a shame, because get past them, and you&#8217;re left with an album that &#8211; as short, and tight, and raw as it is &#8211; shows Rivers at the absolute height of his songwriting powers. There&#8217;s depth and nuance to his lyrics that he&#8217;d rarely find again, wrapped up in melody that climbs free of the shackles of its deliberately underproduced form. &#8220;No Other One&#8221;, for example, is simply <em>gorgeous</em>:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2013/02/weezerology-part-two-the-butterfly-effect/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p>The first four tracks all started life as <em>Songs From The Black Hole</em> demos &#8211; although &#8220;Tired of Sex&#8221; in particular is quite clearly the most personal track Rivers has written up to this point, a lament about his new rock-star lifestyle originally intended to be sung via the autobiographical mouthpiece character of Jonas on the concept album, but ultimately performed directly in the first-person. Indeed, despite dating from an earlier aborted project, all four of these tracks link quite well to the remainder of the album by virtue of being written in the highly personal style first experimented with on the likes of &#8220;Say It Ain&#8217;t So&#8221;. Nevertheless, there&#8217;s a clear break when the album wrenches into its second half, with a track even <em>more</em> unlike anything else heard from them before.</p>
<p>As the emotional peak of an album said to have inspired countless angsty-emotional-bands-with-guitars in the early 2000s, it could be said that &#8220;Across the Sea&#8221; has a lot to answer for. None of the subsequent context, however, should detract from the impact of the song. The lyric is downright bizarre &#8211; a Rivers wracked with self-loathing, responding with almost uncomfortable candour to a letter apparently written by a fan in Japan &#8211; but in the vocal he finds a vulnerability that draws the listener onside. Musically, the track hinges on one of the band&#8217;s most memorable choruses in the first half, before building to the kind of crescendo they&#8217;d already patented so well on the heavier moments of the first album.</p>
<p>&#8220;Across the Sea&#8221; is just the beginning, however, of a pretty remarkable sequence of tracks, which showcase the band at the unassailable height of their powers. &#8220;The Good Life&#8221; is simply furious, as Rivers kicks out at the world from the position in he&#8217;d spent much of late 1995: laid up, immobile, following surgery to adjust the length of one of his legs (no, really). Then there&#8217;s &#8220;El Scorcho&#8221;, the album&#8217;s one Proper Great Pop Single, which should have been as big as &#8220;Buddy Holly&#8221;, but whose performance upon release instead became a microcosm for the general indifference that greeted the album as a whole. Which is baffling, because&#8230; well, because this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2013/02/weezerology-part-two-the-butterfly-effect/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p>This is followed by the equally fantastic &#8220;Pink Triangle&#8221; &#8211; almost certainly the best song ever written about a man accidentally falling in love with a lesbian &#8211; and &#8220;Falling For You&#8221;, perhaps the most complex song musically that the band had recorded at that point. Indeed, the famous line &#8220;What could you possibly see in little old three-chord me?&#8221; is somewhat ironic given the sheer volume of chord progressions and key changes employed throughout.</p>
<p>And then&#8230; there&#8217;s &#8220;Butterfly&#8221;. Titled after the Puccini opera whose character also named the album, it closes the record in unexpected, deliberately anti-climactic fashion. The previous nine tracks might have suggested that an &#8220;Only in Dreams&#8221; mark 2 might round off proceedings &#8211; but instead there&#8217;s just Rivers and an acoustic guitar, and a raw, confessional lyric. While perhaps jarring the first time the album is heard, it feels like a necessary moment of reflection and breathing space, especially after the frenetic pair of tracks that precede it.</p>
<p>And so ends <em>Pinkerton</em>, a thirty-four-and-a-half minute explosion of contradictions, loosely themed around Puccini&#8217;s opera but more openly concerned with themes of longing, desire and frustration. It marked out the band as unquestionably brilliant talents; and yet, perhaps because it&#8217;s not a <em>friendly</em> album the way the first was, it was greeted with disregard at best, and outright hostility at worst, upon its release. That consensus had seen a dramatic reappraisal by the time the band re-emerged in 2001<sup><a href="#fn1">1</a></sup> &#8211; the year the record was finally certified Gold &#8211; but listening to it again now, it&#8217;s hard to see how it was ever anything other than an instant classic.</p>
<h3>6. Pinkerton B-Sides/Miscellany</h3>
<p><strong>1. You Gave Your Love To Me Softly. 2. Devotion. 3. Waiting on You. 4. I Just Threw Out The Love Of My Dreams. 5. Getting Up and Leaving. 6. I Swear It&#8217;s True. 7. Tragic Girl.</strong><br />
<em>Recorded September 1995-June 1996 by Cuomo/Bell/Sharp/Wilson.</em></p>
<p>The b-sides on the <em>Pinkerton</em> singles &#8211; chart flops, every single one &#8211; are an interesting bunch. They actually share a number of characteristics in terms of the style and sound &#8211; so much so that in a way, they feel like a <em>Pinkerton</em> that could have been, if the band had continued to write &#8220;cleaner&#8221; pop songs while still shifting into the slightly edgier sound they&#8217;d developed.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2013/02/weezerology-part-two-the-butterfly-effect/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p>One of the tracks, &#8220;I Just Threw Out The Love Of My Dreams&#8221;, actually <em>was</em> from the album that could have been &#8211; intended originally as a <em>Songs From The Black Hole</em> piece, in the version that was recorded for the <em>Good Life</em> EP it probably offers the closest representation of how that album might have sounded, thanks to the addition of heavy keyboard backing and guest vocals from Rachel Haden.<sup><a href="#fn2">2</a></sup></p>
<p>&#8220;Waiting On You&#8221; and &#8220;Devotion&#8221; are both pretty solid romantic laments from Rivers &#8211; I personally much prefer the former, but I know the latter has its fans &#8211; but there&#8217;s also a lovely, short, punchy slice of pop-rock called &#8220;You Gave Your Love To Me Softly&#8221;. The song was originally recorded for another film soundtrack &#8211; in this case the 1995 teen comedy-drama <em>Angus</em> &#8211; after an earlier song, &#8220;Wanda&#8221; was rejected.<sup><a href="#fn3">3</a></sup> But in a reversal of what happened with &#8220;Susanne&#8221; a year or so before, the generally-preferred version (by fans and the band) was actually the one recorded among the <em>Pinkerton</em> sessions and released as a b-side &#8211; slightly slower-paced, but with an altogether beefier feel.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2013/02/weezerology-part-two-the-butterfly-effect/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p>In 2010, the <em>Pinkerton Deluxe Edition</em> reissue saw the release of two tracks that had originally been intended to feature as B-sides on a single release of &#8220;Pink Triangle&#8221;, which was ultimately shelved following the poor chart performances of &#8220;El Scorcho&#8221; and &#8220;The Good Life&#8221; (not to mention the album itself).<a href="#fn4"><sup>4</sup></a> The two songs have a shared heritage, both also originally having been under consideration as <em>Blue Album</em> cuts. While still incomplete, the <em>Pinkerton</em> era demos show them in a closer-to-final form. &#8220;Getting Up And Leaving&#8221; is the stronger, in my view, with a catchier hook than the slightly plodding &#8220;I Swear It&#8217;s True&#8221;; but neither especially stand out ahead of the album tracks on either of the first two albums.</p>
<p>Far more of a pleasant surprise was the final track on <em>Pinkerton Deluxe</em>, &#8220;Tragic Girl&#8221;. Given how meticulous the writing and recording logs of Weezer&#8217;s song history were, it was astonishing that this track, recorded very late in the <em>Pinkerton</em> sessions,<a href="#fn5"><sup>5</sup></a> was basically forgotten about by just about everybody until it was dug up for the re-release. It&#8217;s <em>magnificent</em>. While its original purpose isn&#8217;t a matter of record, lyrically at least it fits very clearly in with <em>Pinkerton</em>&#8216;s themes, and stylistically it does actually feel like a pretty strong capstone for the album &#8211; it would slot neatly in after &#8220;Falling For You&#8221;. It&#8217;s my guess, therefore, that it was originally considered as the album closer, but later replaced by Rivers with &#8220;Butterfly&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2013/02/weezerology-part-two-the-butterfly-effect/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p>Either way, though, what it does serve pretty neatly as now is the &#8220;final word&#8221; on the <em>Pinkerton</em> era of Weezer &#8211; the last discovered recording, the last track on what will presumably be the definitive re-release of the album, and what&#8217;s more, perhaps the most holistic single-track representation of that style. And in a way, it&#8217;s quite nice to have a track that gives a sense of closure to that whole phase &#8211; because, as we&#8217;ll see next time, following <em>Pinkerton</em>&#8216;s failure and the band&#8217;s near-dissolution, it would be a very different Weezer that would later emerge, to a very different audience&#8230;</p>
<p><em>Weezerology will continue with Part Three, <strong>Bein&#8217; Green</strong>&#8230; hopefully a bit sooner this time!</em></p>
<div class="fnote">
<p><a name="fn1"></a><sup>1</sup> Despite the aforementioned inclusion in their &#8220;worst of the year&#8221; list, in their actual review itself, <em>Rolling Stone</em> had given the album a passable 3/5. A further review in 2004, however, saw them grant it 5/5. Pitchfork, meanwhile, had originally rated the album 7.5, but their review of the 2010 re-release was a perfect 10.0.</p>
<p><a name="fn2"></a><sup>2</sup> Haden was, along with her sister Petra, a member of LA-based group that dog., who put out one terrific album (1997&#8242;s <em>Retreat From The Sun</em>) and two pretty decent ones in the mid to late &#8217;90s. She and Petra were also part of the lineup of Matt Sharp&#8217;s offshoot band The Rentals in its first incarnation. Rachel was slated to play the character of &#8220;Laurel&#8221; (aka &#8220;Lisa&#8221;) in SFTBH, while Joan Wasser of a band called The Dambuilders was to play &#8220;Maria&#8221;.</p>
<p><a name="fn3"></a><sup>3</sup> A version of &#8220;Wanda&#8221; &#8211; whose lyrics are more specifically based on the <em>Angus</em> script than its successor &#8211; can be found on the first volume of Rivers&#8217; <em>Alone</em> compilations.</p>
<p><a name="fn4"></a><sup>4</sup>A shame, incidentally, as the band had actually mixed an improved &#8220;single&#8221; version of Pink Triangle, which hence wouldn&#8217;t be heard properly until years later.</p>
<p><a name="fn5"></a><sup>5</sup> And with Rivers&#8217; friend Adam Orth, rather than the increasingly estranged Matt Sharp, on bass.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2013/02/weezerology-part-two-the-butterfly-effect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012: The Year in Writing</title>
		<link>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/12/2012-the-year-in-writing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/12/2012-the-year-in-writing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seb Patrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/?p=1004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As much for my own reference as anything else &#8211; and because it includes a few things I didn&#8217;t get around to mentioning/linking to here &#8211; here&#8217;s a roundup of some of the things I&#8217;ve written, and for whom, this year. While still bound by the fact that my writing is done around a full-time [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much for my own reference as anything else &#8211; and because it includes a few things I didn&#8217;t get around to mentioning/linking to here &#8211; here&#8217;s a roundup of some of the things I&#8217;ve written, and for whom, this year.</p>
<p>While still bound by the fact that my writing is done around a full-time job &#8211; and the fact that outside of my full-time job, a good chunk of my free writing time is spent doing the weekly updates for <a href="http://www.reddwarf.co.uk/"><strong>reddwarf.co.uk</strong></a>, the fifty-two weeks of which surely make this my most prolific year in terms of published work &#8211; I&#8217;ve managed to expand the range of outlets I&#8217;ve worked for, even as a couple of the ones I&#8217;ve done pieces for in the past (and would have liked to have done more for) have dropped off the radar a little bit.</p>
<p>Of course, the most significant writing-related development of the year wasn&#8217;t any of the below, but the fact that <a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/11/kickstart-my-heart/">James and I now have a budget to make a sitcom</a>. Which also means that, given the bulk of the first half of next year will be given over to writing and producing the thing, I imagine 2013 will generally be a bit quieter for this kind of stuff. But I still feel happy with the way things have developed over the last twelve months, particularly the opportunities people have given me to write for their somewhat noted publications, and I&#8217;m hoping that will continue.</p>
<p>Anyway, here&#8217;s the incomplete-but-covering-most-of-the-important-stuff list of what I&#8217;ve churned out in 2012&#8230;</p>
<h3>The Essential Guide to Movie Superheroes</h3>
<ul>
<li>Two pieces in this &#8220;magbook&#8221; &#8211; going over the history of the Superman and Spider-Man movie franchises. Still available in shops (WH Smith, Tesco etc.) at the moment, but also at <a href="https://www.waterstones.com/waterstonesweb/products/loose+fit+media/magbooks/sb+ltd/the+essential+guide+to+movie+superheroes/9479199/">various</a> <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Essential-Guide-Movie-Superheroes/dp/1781060975">online</a> <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Essential-Guide-Movie-Superheroes/dp/1781060975">places</a>. Various other fellow Den of Geek cohorts contributed to this.</li>
</ul>
<h3>When Saturday Comes</h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://shop.wsc.co.uk/index.php?page=shop.product_details&amp;flypage=shop.flypage&amp;product_id=195&amp;category_id=8&amp;manufacturer_id=0&amp;option=com_virtuemart&amp;Itemid=67">Issue #300</a> - <a href="http://www.wsc.co.uk/reviews/61-Managers/8364-joe-fagan"><em>Joe Fagan: Reluctant Champion</em> review</a>.</li>
<li><a href="http://shop.wsc.co.uk/index.php?page=shop.product_details&amp;flypage=shop.flypage&amp;product_id=207&amp;category_id=8&amp;manufacturer_id=0&amp;option=com_virtuemart&amp;Itemid=67">Issue #304</a> &#8211; Opinion piece on Alan Davies&#8217; comments re Hillsborough</li>
<li><a href="http://shop.wsc.co.uk/index.php?page=shop.product_details&amp;flypage=shop.flypage&amp;product_id=212&amp;category_id=8&amp;manufacturer_id=0&amp;option=com_virtuemart&amp;Itemid=67">Issue #309</a> &#8211; Opinion piece on the absence of modern-day &#8220;fictional footballers&#8221;.</li>
<li><a href="http://shop.wsc.co.uk/index.php?page=shop.product_details&amp;flypage=shop.flypage&amp;product_id=213&amp;category_id=8&amp;manufacturer_id=0&amp;option=com_virtuemart&amp;Itemid=67">Issue #310</a> &#8211; News feature assessing the impact of Liverpool&#8217;s plans to redevelop Anfield</li>
<li>WSC Daily: <a href="http://www.wsc.co.uk/wsc-daily/1034-May-2012/8557-liverpools-bizarre-season-could-have-one-more-twist">Liverpool&#8217;s bizarre season could have one more twist</a></li>
<li>WSC Daily: <a href="http://www.wsc.co.uk/wsc-daily/1034-May-2012/8592-kenny-dalglish-had-no-coherent-plan-for-liverpool">Kenny Dalglish had no coherent plan for Liverpool</a></li>
</ul>
<p>While not out yet, all being well I should also have the back page column in issue #312 of <em>WSC</em>, due at some point in early January.</p>
<h3>New Statesman (online)</h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/culture/2012/12/rise-and-fall-great-british-football-comic">The Rise and Fall of the Great British Football Comic</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Yes, you may note my general attitude of &#8220;Why the heck isn&#8217;t <em>Roy of the Rovers</em> still going?&#8221; as something of a recurring theme this year. Distinct from the article in WSC #309, however, this piece &#8211; which I was commissioned for as part of NS&#8217; British Comics Week &#8211; took a slightly different tack and focused more specifically on comics.</p>
<h3>Wired.co.uk</h3>
<p>A handful of comics news pieces:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-02/14/doctor-who-star-trek-comic"><em>Doctor Who</em> and <em>Star Trek</em> meet in comics crossover</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-06/28/spiderman-sidekick">Spider-Man&#8217;s 50th birthday present: a sidekick</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-07/13/new-sandman"><em>Sandman</em> by Neil Gaiman returns in 2013</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>Comic Book Resources</h3>
<p>Reportage from the 2012 <em>Kapow!</em> convention:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&amp;id=38812">Peter Serafinowicz and Jock team for &#8220;Nelson&#8221;</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&amp;id=38801">Jimmy Carr interviews &#8220;Clint&#8221;&#8216;s Frankie Boyle</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>Film4</h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.film4.com/reviews/2012/the-amazing-spider-man"><em>The Amazing Spider-Man</em> review</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>Den of Geek</h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.denofgeek.com/movies/dredd/22534/karl-urban-interview-playing-dredd-comics-and-more">Karl Urban interview</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.denofgeek.com/tv/saved-by-the-bell/22103/top-10-saved-by-the-bell-episodes">Top Ten <em>Saved By The Bell</em> episodes</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.denofgeek.com/movies/superman/23808/what-did-we-learn-from-the-new-man-of-steel-trailer">What we learned from the <em>Man of Steel</em> trailer</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.denofgeek.com/movies/23169/iron-man-3-trailer-analysis">What we learned from the <em>Iron Man 3</em> trailer</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.denofgeek.com/movies/dredd/21756/what-we-learned-from-the-dredd-trailer">What we learned from the <em>Dredd</em> trailer</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.denofgeek.com/movies/18810/what-we-learned-from-the-new-the-avengers-trailer">What we learned from the new <em>The Avengers</em> trailer</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.denofgeek.com/tv/time-travel/23518/ten-great-sitcom-time-travel-episodes">Ten great sitcom time-travel episodes</a> (with James Hunt)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.denofgeek.com/dvd-bluray/8792/mj-hibbett-and-the-validators-dinosaur-planet-review">MJ Hibbett and the Validators - <em>Dinosaur Planet </em>review</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>Red Dwarf &#8211; The Official Website</h3>
<p>Obviously I was writing a new article every week for the site &#8211; often just simple news bites and the like &#8211; but here are a few longer articles I was quite pleased with this year:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.reddwarf.co.uk/features/history/evolution-of-the-sets/">Evolution of the Sets</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.reddwarf.co.uk/features/history/evolution-of-listers-costumes/index.cfm">Evolution of Lister&#8217;s Costumes</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.reddwarf.co.uk/features/history/evolution-of-rimmers-costumes/index.cfm">Evolution of Rimmer&#8217;s Costumes</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.reddwarf.co.uk/features/history/evolution-of-krytens-costumes/index.cfm">Evolution of Kryten&#8217;s Costumes</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.reddwarf.co.uk/features/history/evolution-of-cats-costumes/index.cfm">Evolution of Cat&#8217;s Costumes</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.reddwarf.co.uk/features/analysis/easter-egg-hunt/index.cfm">Easter Egg Hunt</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.reddwarf.co.uk/news/2012/08/17/quarters-in-full/">Quarters In Full</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>Alternate Cover</h3>
<p>We were largely concerned with our podcasts (yes, two of &#8216;em &#8211; we cancelled and replaced the original one) this year, but we still found time for a few thoughtpieces, including:</p>
<ul>
<li>The Annotated <em>Journey Into Mystery: The Manchester Gods</em> &#8211; parts <a href="http://www.alternatecover.com/2012/06/25/the-annotated-manchester-gods-part-1/">one</a>, <a href="http://www.alternatecover.com/2012/07/02/the-annotated-manchester-gods-part-2/">two</a> and <a href="http://www.alternatecover.com/2012/07/31/the-annotated-manchester-gods-part-3/">three</a>.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.alternatecover.com/2012/12/05/digital-justice/">Digital Justice</a> (a musing by me on the rise of digital comics)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.alternatecover.com/2012/02/02/watchmen-babies/">Watchmen Babies</a> (our less than impressed shared reaction to the <em>Before Watchmen</em> announcement)</li>
</ul>
<h3>Unlimited Rice Pudding!</h3>
<p>In slightly resurrecting URP! as a haven for occasional <em>Who</em> reviews and thought pieces, I wanted to take a slightly different tack with the style of writing on there. I didn&#8217;t get to do as many as I would have liked (though I&#8217;m still intending to cover the Christmas ep at some point), but I think I succeeded with the ones I did. I&#8217;m especially pleased with the Asylum review, probably one of my favourite bits of my own writing this year.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.unlimitedricepudding.co.uk/2012/09/asylum-of-the-daleks/">Asylum of the Daleks</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.unlimitedricepudding.co.uk/2012/09/dinosaurs-on-a-spaceship/">Dinosaurs on a Spaceship</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>F1 Colours</h3>
<p>Damn, I didn&#8217;t manage to put out a single one of my &#8220;Livery History&#8221; articles on F1C in 2012, despite giving the site a massive redesign and relaunch at the start of the year. As is customary I <a href="http://www.f1colours.com/2012/03/15/2012-liveries-the-verdict/">gave my thoughts on the 2012 cars</a>, and prior to that had come up with a <a href="http://www.f1colours.com/2012/02/15/fantasy-2012-grid/">&#8220;Fantasy Grid&#8221;</a> - but still, the site was somewhat neglected after the season began in March. That&#8217;s one I really need to give some attention to next year.</p>
<p>And that was my 2012 in keyboard-bashing. If you&#8217;ve read and enjoyed any of the above (or indeed any of the waffle I&#8217;ve posted on here), then thank you, and <strong>happy new year</strong><strong>!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/12/2012-the-year-in-writing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now That&#8217;s What Seb Calls A Christmas Album! (2012)</title>
		<link>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/12/now-thats-what-seb-calls-a-christmas-album-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/12/now-thats-what-seb-calls-a-christmas-album-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 13:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seb Patrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bloggery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/?p=999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s the beginning of the first working week of December, so of course, once again, this annual festive tradition is here to brighten up the chilly Monday lunchtimes of those of you who haven&#8217;t just kept it saved on your computer from last year. You should know the drill by now, but if you don&#8217;t (and I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the beginning of the first working week of December, so of <em>course</em>, once again, this annual festive tradition is here to brighten up the chilly Monday lunchtimes of those of you who haven&#8217;t just kept it saved on your computer from last year.</p>
<p>You should know the drill by now, but if you don&#8217;t (and I seem to have picked up a fair few new twit-o-chums in the last year or so, so this might actually be the case for once), then it&#8217;s a Christmas compilation album (designed to fit on a single CD, so if I want to bring new stuff in &#8211; which I do some years &#8211; then something else has to make way), made up largely of tracks that are a bit <em>different</em> &#8211; whether that just means they&#8217;re an indie/rock interpretation of a classic, or if they take a slightly fractured or unusual perspective on the festivities. There are one or two exceptions &#8211; stone-cold classics that I just couldn&#8217;t bring myself to leave out &#8211; but on the whole these are songs you&#8217;re less likely to hear while you&#8217;re out and about doing Christmas shopping, but which still (for me, at least) convey a lovely and festive feeling.</p>
<p>This year&#8217;s tracklisting is identical to last year&#8217;s, so if you&#8217;ve already got the 2011 version, all you&#8217;ll find that&#8217;s changed is the file name&#8230; so as ever, Merry Christmas, and enjoy!</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img title="ntwscaca" src="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/ntwscaca.jpeg" alt="ntwscaca" width="268" height="240" /><br />
<a href="https://dl.dropbox.com/u/7176654/NTWSCACA2012.rar">Download <em>Now That&#8217;s What Seb Calls A Christmas Album! (2012 edition)</em></a> (via <a href="http://www.dropbox.com">Dropbox</a>)</p>
<p>1. Vince Guaraldi Trio &#8211; Christmas Time Is Here (2:44)<br />
2. Murray Gold &amp; Neil Hannon &#8211; Song For Ten (3:29)<br />
3. Mariah Carey &#8211; All I Want For Christmas Is You (4:01)<br />
4. Fountains of Wayne &#8211; I Want an Alien For Christmas (2:19)<br />
5. Loudon Wainwright III &#8211; Christmas Morning (3:49)<br />
6. Low &#8211; Just Like Christmas (3:08)<br />
7. The Ronettes &#8211; I Saw Mommy Kissing Santa Claus (2:41)<br />
8. The Ventures &#8211; Sleigh Ride (2:22)<br />
9. Grandaddy &#8211; Alan Parsons in a Winter Wonderland (2:59)<br />
10. Bright Eyes &#8211; Blue Christmas (2:19)<br />
11. Eels &#8211; Everything&#8217;s Gonna Be Cool This Christmas (2:48)<br />
12. The Vandals &#8211; Oi To The World (2:15)<br />
13. The Beach Boys &#8211; Little Saint Nick (2:10)<br />
14. Zombina &amp; The Skeletones &#8211; A Chainsaw For Christmas (3:11)<br />
15. The Ramones &#8211; Merry Christmas (I Don&#8217;t Wanna Fight Tonight) (2:06)<br />
16. The Kinks &#8211; Father Christmas (3:43)<br />
17. Rilo Kiley &#8211; Xmas Cake (5:24)<br />
18. Jonathan Coulton &#8211; Chiron Beta Prime (2:51)<br />
19. Spitting Image &#8211; Santa Claus Is On The Dole (3:48)<br />
20. The Long Blondes &#8211; Christmas is Cancelled (4:29)<br />
21. Half Man Half Biscuit &#8211; It&#8217;s Cliched To Be Cynical At Christmas (3:48)<br />
22. She &amp; Him &#8211; Have Yourself A Merry Little Christmas (3:42)<br />
23. Badly Drawn Boy &#8211; Donna and Blitzen (4:19)<br />
24. My Chemical Romance &#8211; All I Want For Christmas Is You (3:45)</p>
<p>This year, though, I&#8217;ve also decided to throw in an extra little treat. You may or may not already be aware that a few of the above tracks come from an XFM-produced compilation album from 2000 called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It's_a_Cool_Cool_Christmas"><em>It&#8217;s a Cool Cool Christmas</em></a>. This album&#8217;s pretty hard to track down these days &#8211; it&#8217;s long out of print, second-hand copies are rare, and I don&#8217;t believe there&#8217;s a legal download of it available &#8211; so I&#8217;ve decided to make a copy of it available for those who want to hear the whole thing (personally, I think I&#8217;ve already picked out the best cuts from it and used them above, but you may well disagree). <a href="https://dl.dropbox.com/u/7176654/CoolCoolChristmas.rar">You can get that here</a>, at least for as long as it&#8217;s there before someone important notices and shouts at me to get rid of it.</p>
<p>What I will say, however, is that it was originally put out as a charity record in support of <a href="http://www.bigissue.org.uk/">The Big Issue</a>, an organisation that I consider to be a highly worthy cause (particularly around Christmas, when many of those suffering homelessness tend to feel it most acutely). So if you <em>are</em> going to download it, perhaps you might want to think about <a href="http://www.bigissue.org.uk/donate">dropping them a small (or even a not so small) donation at the same time</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/12/now-thats-what-seb-calls-a-christmas-album-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kickstart My Heart</title>
		<link>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/11/kickstart-my-heart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/11/kickstart-my-heart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 07:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seb Patrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bloggery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A Brief History of Time Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chaos Theatre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kickstarter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/?p=987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m still trying to take in the notion that James and I &#8211; basically two pretty much entirely unheard-of writers &#8211; made a public proposal a month ago to create something new in a completely unfashionable medium (audio sitcom), and asked people to stake money on it up front in the hope that we&#8217;d get [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter  wp-image-990" title="ABHoTT" src="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/aBHoTT_BGLight_1200pix-1024x576.jpg" alt="" width="530" height="299" /></p>
<p>I&#8217;m still trying to take in the notion that <a href="http://www.jrhunt.co.uk/">James</a> and I &#8211; basically two pretty much entirely unheard-of writers &#8211; made <a href="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/sebpatrick/a-brief-history-of-time-travel">a public proposal</a> a month ago to create something new in a completely unfashionable medium (audio sitcom), and asked people to stake money on it up front in the hope that we&#8217;d get it made and give them something great in return. And that people actually <em>did.</em></p>
<p>And sure, many of them were friends and family, or people who knew us via Twitter.</p>
<p>But plenty of them weren&#8217;t. Plenty of them had never heard of us before seeing the words <em>A Brief History of Time Travel</em>.</p>
<p>And sure, many of them probably only had their interest piqued by the fact that we somehow got Robert Llewellyn to agree to be the narrator (a relatively small role, in which he&#8217;ll basically open and close each episode, but enough of a feather in our cap to give us the second wind of a mid-campaign publicity push). But <em>he</em> thought enough of what we laid out to want to agree to get involved in the first place, which has surely got to say something about it as well.</p>
<p>And some people said &#8220;We want to make <em>sure</em> this gets made&#8221;, and went far above and beyond anything we might have expected anyone to pledge, in order to do that.</p>
<p>At the time that I&#8217;m writing this post, the Kickstarter campaign hasn&#8217;t quite yet finished, but we&#8217;ve just managed to nudge above a landmark figure of £5,000 raised. That&#8217;s five thousand pounds that people thought was worth spending on seeing this happen, based on nothing more than our plot outlines, our descriptions of what we wanted to do with the series, and a silly five-minute promo sketch with a couple of half-decent jokes in it, recorded in my living room on my laptop with an embroidery hoop and a pair of tights used as a microphone shield.</p>
<p>Even if there are no more backers between my writing this and the campaign finishing, then almost 150 people have said &#8220;Yeah, we want to hear this. Impress us.&#8221; Every single one of those people &#8211; even the ones that have known us since we were children &#8211; have decided that they have some measure of faith in us as comedy writers.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s my thirtieth birthday today. I&#8217;ve got a pretty damned good reason to celebrate.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/11/kickstart-my-heart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elliott Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/10/elliott-smith/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/10/elliott-smith/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 15:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seb Patrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bloggery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elliott smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/?p=976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a reworking/rewriting of something I did back on the much-missed Noise To Signal on this same anniversary a few years back. I&#8217;m reposting it here, a year short of a decade since Elliott died, as a further tribute, and with some updated music links to enjoy&#8230; On 22nd October 2003, I was sitting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This is a reworking/rewriting of something I did back on the much-missed <a href="http://www.noisetosignal.org/">Noise To Signal</a> on this same anniversary a few years back. I&#8217;m reposting it here, a year short of a decade since Elliott died, as a further tribute, and with some updated music links to enjoy&#8230;</em></p>
<div id="attachment_978" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 519px"><img class="size-full wp-image-978" title="elliottsmith" src="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/elliottsmith.jpg" alt="" width="509" height="370" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Elliott Smith: August 6, 1969 – October 21, 2003</p></div>
<p>On 22nd October 2003, I was sitting in my college library browsing the internet when I saw <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/3203923.stm">a surprising headline</a> on BBC News. The singer/songwriter Steven Paul “Elliott” Smith had been found dead in his apartment a day earlier, of two stab wounds to the chest, at the age of 34. At the time, I&#8217;d only really heard one or two of Elliott&#8217;s albums in full, and only owned one &#8211; 2000&#8242;s <em>Figure 8</em>. Despite this, it had been an integral enough influence on my taste and listening habits during my post-adolescent period, and featured certain songs that had been such a comfort during a difficult period I was going through in that latter half of 2003, that I was genuinely saddened by this death for reasons beyond the unutterably tragic <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliott_Smith#Death">circumstances</a> in which they occurred.</p>
<p>It’s something of a cliché that the death of an artist is one of the best things that can happen to their record sales – and I didn’t particularly want to be part of that vulture-like culture. Nevertheless, I felt sufficiently guilty about never having fully explored his music while he was alive – and sufficiently moved by the circumstances of his life and death, the more I read about him – that I felt an obligation to further delve into the work of someone who’d already meant a surprising amount to me. What I discovered was that Elliott’s music – both as written and as performed – has the ability to reach inside and pull at the fabric of my soul like just about no-one else I’ve ever heard. As such, for getting on for nine years now, his songs have taken on greater and greater importance in my life.<br />
<span id="more-976"></span><br />
It’s not like he was the most groundbreaking or influential musician. In truth, that side of him was relatively simple. He had two distinct phases, each preferred to differing degrees by various sections of his fanbase &#8211; his earlier albums were pure, stripped-down, one-man-and-his-guitar acoustic stylings; whereas a shift in the late ’90s saw him move towards a more Beatlesy, pop-influenced sound that took in all manner of arrangements and instrumentation (including using piano, rather than guitar, as the driving force behind a good number of his songs). While it’s probably heresy among the majority of Smith’s fans to say it, for the most part I actually prefer the more complex sound of these later albums &#8211; he had a superb knack for constructing harmony, for layering his sound, and this is most evident on what I&#8217;ve long thought is his masterpiece, 1998’s <em>XO</em>. At the same time, mind, it could just as easily be argued (and it&#8217;s something I&#8217;ve come around to more in recent years) that his purest and most perfect songwriting was to be found on the last &#8220;acoustic&#8221; album, <em>Either/Or</em>. In both eras, though, his strongest sense was one of melody &#8211; with particular emphasis on transitions, apparently his favourite part of any song.</p>
<div id="attachment_981" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 501px"><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/smithwall.jpg" rel="lightbox[976]"><img class=" wp-image-981  " title="smithwall" src="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/smithwall-1024x768.jpg" alt="" width="491" height="369" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">I finally got to make the pilgrimage to the Elliott tribute wall, at Solutions Audio in Los Angeles, in December 2009. The extensive graffiti (not all of it, sadly, fan tributes) has since been painted over.</p></div>
<p>What really made Elliott’s records stand out, though, were his vocals. He had a beautiful, delicate voice, memorably described as “spiderweb-thin” &#8211; and yet had little to no confidence in it whatsoever. Ironically enough, though, this self-doubt would lead to one of the most distinctive elements of his sound &#8211; unconvinced of his voice’s ability to carry songs on its own, he would frequently multi-track it, creating gorgeous layered harmonies. This is perhaps most evident on his stunning cover of the Beatles’ “Because”, featured on the closing credits of <em>American Beauty</em> (and one of the only examples I can think of where someone’s covered a Lennon/McCartney song and improved it), or on <em>Figure 8</em>’s “Everything Means Nothing To Me”, with its repeated yet ever-building refrain. It’s the voice, more than anything, that gets inside me like a piece of grit in my heart &#8211; certain moments in his songs will bring me out in goosebumps, or even spark an involuntary tear on occasion.</p>
<p>It’s easy enough, if you’re being simplistic, to write Elliott’s songs off as “music to slit your wrists to”. But there’s so much more to it than that. Yes, his lyrics were extremely dark at times, reflecting his own life and personal demons. And yes, there’s something deeply melancholy about much of his distinctive sound &#8211; the combination of near-exclusive use of minor chords and that heart-rending voice. But it’s a <em>good</em> kind of melancholy. Some music that people would think of as “depressing” is just that &#8211; but Elliott’s was more comforting. Perhaps it was that he would, like Morrissey, dress up such dark lyrics in such appealing tunes (minor key or no minor key), but while you may listen to his music when you’re feeling sad, you don’t necessarily do it to wallow or be melodramatic. There can be beauty, and a strange sort of contentment, in sadness &#8211; and whether intentionally or otherwise, I think that’s something Elliott’s music frequently encapsulated.</p>
<p>It’s true that if you just don’t “get” Elliott, you probably never will. But I wonder just how many people are only aware of him as “that depressed singer-songwriter who killed himself” (if they know even that), and who would be genuinely surprised to discover what a beautiful, engaging and downright classic body of work he produced in his all-too-short career. The purpose of my writing this, then, is twofold &#8211; firstly, to pay tribute to someone I feel is a genuine great, whose music has genuinely either helped me or just struck a chord at certain times, and who I feel is a tragic loss to the world; and secondly, in the hope that some of you who may pay any kind of attention to what I’m talking about might be inspired to go and check out some of his work, and make a similar discovery of your own. To that end, I leave you with a selection of songs and performances drawn from across his back catalogue&#8230;</p>
<h3>Miss Misery (<em>Good Will Hunting</em> soundtrack, 1997)</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/10/elliott-smith/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<h3>Waltz #2 (XO) (<em>XO</em>, 1998)</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/10/elliott-smith/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<h3>No Name #3 (<em>Roman Candle</em>, 1994)</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/10/elliott-smith/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<h3>Angeles (<em>Either/Or</em>, 1997)</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/10/elliott-smith/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<h3>Stupidity Tries (<em>Figure 8</em>, 2000)</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/10/elliott-smith/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<h3>Suicide Machine (unreleased)</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/10/elliott-smith/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<h3>Pretty (Ugly Before) (<em>From A Basement On The Hill</em>, 2004)</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/10/elliott-smith/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<h3>Coming Up Roses (<em>Elliott Smith</em>, 1995)</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/10/elliott-smith/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<h3>Because (<em>American Beauty</em> soundtrack, 1999)</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/10/elliott-smith/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<h3>Say Yes (<em>Either/Or</em>, 1997)</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/10/elliott-smith/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/10/elliott-smith/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Slime&#8217;s Coming Home</title>
		<link>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/10/the-slimes-coming-home/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/10/the-slimes-coming-home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seb Patrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bloggery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Dwarf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/?p=963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eleven months ago, I took a train down to Shepperton, and made my way to the Grant Naylor Productions office to discuss the terms of my taking over the job of running the official Red Dwarf website. A couple of weeks later, one of my first news updates on the site was the announcement of how [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/corridor1.jpg" rel="lightbox[963]"><img class="alignleft  wp-image-971" title="corridor" src="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/corridor1-224x300.jpg" alt="" width="157" height="210" /></a>Eleven months ago, I took a train down to Shepperton, and made my way to the Grant Naylor Productions office to discuss the terms of my taking over the job of running <a href="http://www.reddwarf.co.uk/">the official <em>Red Dwarf</em> website</a>. A couple of weeks later, one of my first news updates on the site was the announcement of how fans could get tickets to see the brand new Series X being recorded. In mid-December, I was sitting with 299 excited others watching one of those very recordings. In January, I had to repeatedly pinch myself as I walked around the set on a pre-record day (I was <em>on Red Dwarf</em>. On the <em>actual ship</em>! See the rather-appallingly-taken picture at left, which I finally feel safe enough to share now that everyone&#8217;s seen the sets and we&#8217;re all about to see the actual episodes) And now, finally, after what&#8217;s at times seemed like a never-ending wait, the new series is upon us. Episode one of <em>Red Dwarf X</em>, &#8220;Trojan&#8221;, airs for the first time on <a href="http://www.joindave.co.uk/">Dave</a> at 9pm.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/premiere.jpg" rel="lightbox[963]"><img class="alignright  wp-image-969" title="premiere" src="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/premiere-300x224.jpg" alt="" width="210" height="157" /></a>I&#8217;ve already <a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/03/red-dwarf-x/">written</a> about my opinion on the series in general based on my experiences of having seen a number of the episodes recorded &#8211; an opinion that&#8217;s only been strengthened by, last night, watching &#8220;Trojan&#8221; at the Prince Charles Cinema in London. It&#8217;s come together absolutely <em>beautifully</em> &#8211; it&#8217;s funny, of course, as funny as it was seeing it &#8220;live&#8221; (indeed, one scene in particular plays out magnificently as a direct result of that live recording, with one of the most brilliant examples of a cast riding laughter and timing their deliveries to perfection); but it also looks incredible, with some truly stunning model-based outer space sequences that, just as in the show&#8217;s &#8220;classic&#8221; years, complement the sitcom material perfectly.</p>
<p>Having been a fan of this show for over twenty years, it&#8217;s still quite unbelievable that we&#8217;ve got a new, full series of it. And, more impressively, that said full series is so <em>great</em>. It&#8217;s obviously difficult to talk in detail about a lot of the reasons why that is, but it&#8217;s at least possible to vaguely hint at a few things. So for a bit of fun, here are a few cryptic teasers. I will neither confirm or deny any guesses anybody might have as to what they mean, however, so you might as well keep them to yourselves, and then just be smug afterwards if you got any of them right:</p>
<p>1. T f a c w h n b s o s s 1989.</p>
<p>2. D D c m t t t R D c p S.</p>
<p>3. W f t R t a u o I a m h f a.</p>
<p>4. A c c H, w w o g t a i t m, i a i T B.</p>
<p>5. A a w a i S VI p a s &#8211; b d &#8211; c i E.</p>
<p>6. T f l o t s i a c t t v f e.</p>
<p>Enjoy the series. I think it&#8217;s brilliant, and I think you&#8217;ll think so too.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/torso.jpg" rel="lightbox[963]"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-968" title="torso" src="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/torso-224x300.jpg" alt="" width="224" height="300" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/10/the-slimes-coming-home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Back to the Future Day</title>
		<link>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/06/back-to-the-future-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/06/back-to-the-future-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seb Patrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bloggery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Back to the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pedantry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/?p=939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh good, it&#8217;s that time of year again, when Back to the Future date hoaxes do the rounds on Twitter and Facebook. And the rest of us bang our heads on the table in despair. Look, I don&#8217;t blame the people who start these things, who photoshop a date in 2010 or 2011 or 2012 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/bttfnonononoargh.jpg" alt="" title="bttfnonononoargh" width="480" height="300" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-940" /></p>
<p>Oh good, it&#8217;s that time of year again, when <em>Back to the Future</em> date hoaxes <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/search/back%20to%20the%20future">do the rounds on Twitter and Facebook</a>. And the rest of us bang our heads on the table in despair.</p>
<p>Look, I don&#8217;t blame the people who <em>start</em> these things, who photoshop a date in 2010 or 2011 or 2012 onto a screengrab of the DeLorean&#8217;s date readout. They&#8217;re trying to wind up the internet, and they&#8217;re succeeding. It&#8217;s an old joke, now, but if people keep falling for it they&#8217;re going to keep doing it.</p>
<p>But the people who keep spreading it around, and making it so <em>easy</em> to wind everyone up&#8230; ARGH. <em>Why do I let it bother me?</em> I wonder to myself. I mean, I&#8217;m a massive pedant, everyone knows that. But this one gets my back up more than most &#8211; and I think it&#8217;s because I love BTTF <em>so</em> much &#8211; it&#8217;s one of the most truly delightful, joyous, wonderful things that modern pop culture has ever created &#8211; that it irritates me that other people don&#8217;t care enough to get it right.</p>
<p>I mean, look: if you like BTTF enough that you think it will be pretty cool when we finally land on the future date featured in the film (and it will), then surely you should at <em>least</em> know these two basic facts:</p>
<p><strong>1. Every year featured in the <em>Back to the Future</em> trilogy ends in a 5.</strong></p>
<p><strong>2. The first <em>Back to the Future</em> film is about travelling BACKWARDS in time, not FORWARDS.</strong></p>
<p>Beyond those two fundamentals, however, as a Public Service Announcement I thought it would be a good idea to compile a list of all the dates referenced in the BTTF films &#8211; so that next time one of these spreads around, there&#8217;s a handy and quick reference by which to confirm that it&#8217;s utter bollocks. So here it is.</p>
<h3>Back to the Future</h3>
<p>The dates the Doc punches in when showing Marty how the controls work are:</p>
<ul>
<li>July 4th 1776 (&#8220;the signing of the Declaration of Independence&#8221;)</li>
<li>December 25th 0000 (&#8220;the birth of Christ&#8221;)</li>
<li>November 5th 1955 (&#8220;a red letter day for science&#8221;)</li>
</ul>
<p>This last date is the date that Marty gets transported back in time to, as it&#8217;s the one left on screen when the Libyans arrive. Despite what some Twitterers say, <strong>the Doc never puts in &#8220;a random date&#8221;.</strong></p>
<p>The date on which lightning strikes the clock tower and Marty returns to 1985 is:</p>
<ul>
<li>November 12th 1955</li>
</ul>
<p>The date in 1985 that Marty returns to is:</p>
<ul>
<li>October 26th 1985</li>
</ul>
<p>The date the Doc travels to at the end is:</p>
<ul>
<li>An unspecified day and month in 2015</li>
</ul>
<h3>Back to the Future Part II</h3>
<p>The date the Doc brings Jennifer and Marty to (<strong>and thus, the ACTUAL &#8220;Future Day&#8221;</strong>) is:</p>
<ul>
<li>October 21 2015</li>
</ul>
<p>The date Old Biff travels to and gives the Almanac to his past self is:</p>
<ul>
<li>November 12 1955</li>
</ul>
<p>The date in &#8220;alternate&#8221; 1985 that Marty and the Doc return to is:</p>
<ul>
<li>October 26th 1985</li>
</ul>
<p>The date Marty and the Doc go back to retrieve the Almanac is also:</p>
<ul>
<li>November 12 1955</li>
</ul>
<p>The date the Doc accidentally travels back to, because of the lightning strike jolting the time circuits (<strong>the ONLY time a &#8220;random&#8221; date is travelled to</strong>) is:</p>
<ul>
<li>January 1 1885</li>
</ul>
<h3>Back to the Future Part III</h3>
<p>The date Marty leaves 1955 to go back to the Old West:</p>
<ul>
<li>November 16 1955</li>
</ul>
<p>The date Marty arrives in the Old West:</p>
<ul>
<li>September 2 1885</li>
</ul>
<p>The date Marty leaves the Old West:</p>
<ul>
<li>September 7 1885</li>
</ul>
<p>The date Marty arrives back in 1985 and the DeLorean is destroyed:</p>
<ul>
<li>October 27th 1985</li>
</ul>
<p>So there we go. Now, STOP IT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/06/back-to-the-future-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weezerology Part One: Into the Blue</title>
		<link>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/06/weezerology-part-one-into-the-blue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/06/weezerology-part-one-into-the-blue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seb Patrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bloggery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weezerology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/?p=854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Weezer. Alternative rock band from Los Angeles, California, specialising (mostly) in melodic power-pop, usually with a romantic lyrical bent. Formed in 1992, with a lineup that has consisted of Rivers Cuomo (vocals and guitar, 1992-present), Patrick Wilson (drums, 1992-present), Matt Sharp (bass and vocals, 1992-1998), Brian Bell (guitar and vocals, 1993-present), Jason Cropper (guitar and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-766" title="Weezerology" src="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/weezerology.jpg" alt="" width="477" height="261" /></p>
<p>Weezer. Alternative rock band from Los Angeles, California, specialising (mostly) in melodic power-pop, usually with a romantic lyrical bent. Formed in 1992, with a lineup that has consisted of Rivers Cuomo (vocals and guitar, 1992-present), Patrick Wilson (drums, 1992-present), Matt Sharp (bass and vocals, 1992-1998), Brian Bell (guitar and vocals, 1993-present), Jason Cropper (guitar and vocals, 1992-1993), Mikey Welsh (bass and vocals, 1998-2001) and Scott Shriner (bass and vocals, 2001-present). Primary name associated with the phrase &#8220;geek rock&#8221;, and the most direct influence on the late &#8217;90s/early 2000s US popular emo-core movement (Jimmy Eat World, The Get Up Kids, Saves the Day etc.).</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve been basically my favourite band since I started listening to them with a vengeance in mid-2000, but I haven&#8217;t really written much about them (a couple of track-by-track reviews aside) since I abandoned my surprisingly-popular fansite, WeezerfansUK, about eight or nine years ago. That&#8217;s changing with this blog project, in which I&#8217;m listening to every one of their songs, in chronological order, and writing about them on an era-by-era basis. If you want a full tracklist and an explanation of the self-imposed rules, <a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/06/weezerology-an-introduction/">check out the introductory post</a> &#8211; but if you&#8217;re ready to get on with the project, then read on.</p>
<p>(And feel free to do a listen of the albums &#8211; or a re-listen, if you&#8217;re a fan &#8211; yourself, and join in with your comments, if you fancy it. I&#8217;ve tried to make this as accessible as possible both to long-time fans, and to those who don&#8217;t know much about the band but might find it an interesting read, so here and there you&#8217;ll find embedded Youtube songs so you can hear some of the things I&#8217;m talking about.)</p>
<p><span id="more-854"></span></p>
<h3>1. The Kitchen Tapes &amp; Early Demos</h3>
<p><strong>1. Thief, You’ve Taken All That Was Me. 2. Let’s Sew Our Pants Together. 3. Paperface. 4. Lullaby for Wayne.</strong><br />
<em>Recorded August 1992 – September 1993 by Cuomo/Cropper/Sharp/Wilson/Bell.</em></p>
<p>Throughout 1992 and 1993, the newly-formed Weezer &#8211; Rivers Cuomo, Matt Sharp, Jason Cropper and Pat Wilson &#8211; recorded three distinct sets of demos at Rivers and Matt&#8217;s home in Santa Monica, LA. The middle-most of these, known as <em>The Kitchen Tapes</em> (by virtue of having been recorded&#8230; er, in the kitchen), was the most well-known &#8211; and unlike the one that followed it (which saw the band honing a handful of their preferred tracks), it featured a few tracks that wouldn&#8217;t be carried forwards. A number of <em>Blue Album</em> songs were also included on this tape, but in the interests of doing this thing properly, I&#8217;ll skip over them and discuss them when we get to the album itself.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, the three songs we&#8217;re left with &#8211; &#8220;Thief, You&#8217;ve Taken All That Was Me&#8221;, &#8220;Let&#8217;s Sew Our Pants Together&#8221; and &#8220;Paperface&#8221;, are of strong historical interest. Although not brought forwards onto the album, they&#8217;re still quite reflective of where Weezer&#8217;s sound lay in their early days. There&#8217;s a strong ear for melody (especially on &#8220;Let&#8217;s Sew Our Pants Together&#8221;), while the yearning tone that would characterise Rivers&#8217; early lyrics is most discernable on &#8220;Thief&#8230;&#8221;, which to me is the standout of the three songs:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/06/weezerology-part-one-into-the-blue/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p>Perhaps the &#8220;actual&#8221; Weezer song it&#8217;s most similar to is &#8220;The World Has Turned And Left Me Here&#8221;, which was also among the earliest tracks demoed. This similarity, in fact, could explain why it was left out of the album sessions proper. Meanwhile, the last of the three, &#8220;Paperface&#8221;, is something of a fan favourite &#8211; but it&#8217;s also the least &#8220;Weezerish&#8221; of the lot, instead betraying Rivers&#8217; earlier interest in heavier rock. It&#8217;s a fun, fast-paced number, but it&#8217;s easy to see why it didn&#8217;t warrant inclusion as the band honed in on their distinct style. It&#8217;s also interesting to note, on all three tracks, the different vocal approach that Rivers takes &#8211; it&#8217;s more whispery in the main, but with a harsher edge, than he&#8217;d later employ on the generally more harmonious album proper.</p>
<p>In late summer 1993, Weezer went into the studio to record what would become <em>The Blue Album</em>. The earliest sessions included a handful of additional tracks that were dropped after the first demo stage; some were picked up at later dates, so we&#8217;ll discuss these at the relevant time, but one song &#8211; &#8220;Lullaby for Wayne&#8221; &#8211; was never attempted again. Although slower than &#8220;Paperface&#8221;, it&#8217;s got a similarly heavy edge &#8211; which may also explain why it didn&#8217;t make the album &#8211; and is also somewhat more serious in lyrical subject matter (although, perhaps deliberately, the question of whether it&#8217;s actually about a particular real-life school shooting has always been left vague).</p>
<h3>2. <em>Weezer</em> (aka <em>The Blue Album</em>)</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/bluealbum.jpg" rel="lightbox[854]"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-863" title="The Blue Album (1994)" src="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/bluealbum-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a><strong>1. My Name Is Jonas. 2. No-One Else. 3. The World Has Turned And Left Me Here. 4. Buddy Holly. 5. Undone: The Sweater Song. 6. Surf Wax America. 7. Say It Ain’t So. 8. In The Garage. 9. Holiday. 10. Only In Dreams.</strong><br />
<em>Recorded August-September 1993 by Cuomo/Sharp/Wilson/Bell. Produced by Ric Ocasek. Released May 1994.</em></p>
<p>There are a handful of songs for which I know exactly where I was the first time I heard them. &#8220;Buddy Holly&#8221; is one of them (sitting in a parked car in Formby with Simon Mayo&#8217;s Radio 1 show on, if you&#8217;re wondering). This perfectly-constructed, immortally-catchy nugget of a pop song has remained permanently in my head ever since &#8211; and although it would take me a few years to get around to actually listening to any <em>more</em> Weezer (on the rare occasions I bought or was gifted albums at that age, they were usually Blur records), hearing the song for the first time was a hugely significant moment in my personal musical taste. And eighteen years later, I&#8217;m still not tired of it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/06/weezerology-part-one-into-the-blue/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p>&#8220;Buddy Holly&#8221; serves as a strong microcosm for the rest of the album as a whole: carefully wrought, hugely slick, and surprisingly confident for a band at this stage of their career. It meshes the sunny power-pop that Rivers was capable of writing so effortlessly (and which producer Ric Ocasek could make sound so finely polished) with his younger self&#8217;s harder-rock sensibilities &#8211; so there are memorable guitar crunches and outstanding solos all over the shop. Nothing ever feels accidental, however &#8211; even all the feedback noise seems very carefully placed for maximum effect.</p>
<p>Does this apparent lack of spontaneity harm <em>The Blue Album</em>, however? Is everything a little <em>too</em> carefully polished &#8211; to an almost cynical extent? It&#8217;s an accusation you could almost certainly level at later Weezer at times (and I will, trust me), but at this stage&#8230; I don&#8217;t think so. It&#8217;s merely a band very quickly, and very confidently, finding a distinctive sound at which they&#8217;re <em>extremely</em> good. It&#8217;s especially impressive that they managed this despite changing lineup partway through the sessions &#8211; with Jason Cropper leaving for family reasons, and being replaced by Brian Bell, formerly the bassist in a band called Carnival Art.<sup><a href="#fn1">1</a></sup></p>
<p>The lyrical tone of the album is as consistent as the musicality. A recurring theme is of Rivers as an awkward, lonely outsider, looking in on things &#8211; most notably, of course, on &#8220;In the Garage&#8221; (lyrics about <em>Dungeons &amp; Dragons</em> and the X-Men&#8217;s Kitty Pryde and Nightcrawler turning the band on to a generation of similarly alienated nerds), but also the gentle yearning of  &#8221;The World Has Turned And Left Me Here&#8221; and the altogether more pronounced yearning of &#8220;Say It Ain&#8217;t So&#8221;. The latter prefigures <em>Pinkerton</em> somewhat, in that it involves Rivers writing directly about his own personal life: specifically, his fear that alcohol was to break up the marriage of his mother and step-father (the &#8220;Stephen&#8221; of the song&#8217;s lyrics) as it had with his father (who did indeed &#8220;find Jesus&#8221;, becoming a bishop in Germany years after having initially lost contact with Rivers).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/06/weezerology-part-one-into-the-blue/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p><em>Blue</em>, then, is a remarkably assured record: album tracks that for many other bands would be little more than forgettable filler, like &#8220;Surf Wax America&#8221;, &#8220;The World Has Turned&#8230;&#8221; and &#8220;Holiday&#8221;, are rock-solid pop songs in their own right, and you feel that almost any of the ten cuts here (with the possible exception of &#8220;No-One Else&#8221; and its chugging, awkwardly-ironic lyrics) could have stood out as a single. Yet for all this polished consistency, it does contain a couple of flashes of idiosyncrasy.</p>
<p>&#8220;Undone: The Sweater Song&#8221; manages to use the polished production, and a ridiculously catchy chorus, to mask the fact that it&#8217;s actually a <em>completely batshit insane</em> track. Each of the two actual &#8220;verses&#8221; (themselves only consisting of barely-sensical two-word lines) is preceded by an instrumental segment, over which a snippet of conversation<sup><a href="#fn2">2</a></sup> is played. And the lyrics are, ostensibly, about the gradual unravelling of a woollen sweater. All things considered, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHQqqM5sr7g">the Spike Jonze-directed video</a> &#8211; in which the band mime badly to the song in slow motion against a blue backdrop before being joined by a random assortment of running dogs &#8211; is somewhat apt for the tone of the thing.</p>
<p>Both &#8220;Buddy Holly&#8221; and &#8220;Undone&#8221; were singles &#8211; and in an era in which people still sat in front of music TV and watched the videos that were chosen and put before them, they consequently became extremely familiar even while not being huge chart hits (although &#8220;Buddy Holly&#8221;, of course, attracted huge waves of attention thanks to its marvellous <em>Happy Days</em> themed video being featured on the Windows 95 CD as an early demonstration of PCs&#8217; multimedia capabilities). Potentially less familiar (at least to those of you who don&#8217;t avidly follow the band) is the album&#8217;s closing track, and the second of the two more unconventional moments, &#8220;Only In Dreams&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/06/weezerology-part-one-into-the-blue/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p>&#8220;Only In Dreams&#8221; is distinctive for two main reasons: firstly, Matt Sharp&#8217;s hugely memorable bass line (which drones consistently for almost the entire track, before kicking into a higher-paced version of the same melody later on), and secondly, the track&#8217;s length. Early demos of the track clocked in around five minutes, and faded to a quiet conclusion at that point. It was still a great-sounding song, with that terrific chorus, but it never quite kicked into the truly epic beast it would become. The album version &#8211; aside from being a much-cleaned-up production &#8211; pans out in much the same way for those fist five minutes, but the original end point is now the cue for a quite monumental crescendo, in which the now-quietened instruments increase in tempo and volume. This results in a spectacular climax just short of seven minutes, where on a single beat everything comes crashing back in. It&#8217;s a spine-tingling moment, and even after having heard the song hundreds of times &#8211; even after seeing the band do it live, with an explosion of confetti and lighting at the climactic second that still ranks as one of the most purely joyous moments I&#8217;ve ever experienced &#8211; I get goosebumps every single time.</p>
<p>So, yes. <em>The Blue Album</em>. It&#8217;s quite a good debut.</p>
<h3>3. Blue Album B-Sides</h3>
<p><strong>1. Mykel and Carli. 2. Susanne. 3. Jamie. 4. My Evaline</strong><br />
<em>Recorded April 1993-June 1994 by Cuomo/Cropper/Sharp/Wilson/Bell.</em></p>
<p>Ah, for a time when Weezer actually recorded distinct individual songs as the B-sides for their singles. With the exception of &#8220;My Evaline&#8221; &#8211; a daft and fun little barbershop cover &#8211; the three <em>Blue</em> era B-sides are outstanding tracks. Though none of them were recorded during the album sessions, all could quite happily fit on the record &#8211; and at least two could have stood out as genuine hit singles of their own.</p>
<p>In fact, &#8220;Jamie&#8221; was originally intended as a single. Recorded in Spring 1993, when Cropper had yet to be replaced by Bell, it was planned as a debut 7&#8243; release &#8211; but for reasons unknown, these plans were shelved, and the track didn&#8217;t see light until July 1994, two months after the release of the album, when it was featured on a Geffen Records compilation called <em>DGC Rarities 1</em>. It got a wider release here in the UK, however, as the B-side to &#8220;Buddy Holly&#8221; &#8211; which is where I first heard it. It&#8217;s a gorgeous song, written as an affectionate tribute to Jamie Young, the band&#8217;s first attorney.<sup><a href="#fn3">3</a></sup></p>
<p>In fact, it&#8217;s interesting to note that &#8211; again with the exception of &#8220;My Evaline&#8221; &#8211; all the <em>Blue</em> b-sides were written in tribute to friends of the band. &#8220;Mykel and Carli&#8221;, however, would ultimately have an altogether more poignant context associated with it. Originally written in early 1993 as a song called &#8220;Please Pick Up The Phone&#8221;, it was later rewritten and demoed as &#8220;To Mykel and Carli (From a High School Friend)&#8221;, and finally just as &#8220;Mykel and Carli&#8221;, in honour of Weezer&#8217;s two biggest fans. Mykel and Carli Allan were sisters who had followed the band from their earliest days, and ended up responding to fan letters (such as sending out <em>Blue Album</em> lyric sheets) in those pre-Internet days, before setting up the official Weezer fan club itself. The song was trialled during the <em>Blue Album</em> sessions, but the band didn&#8217;t hit on a version they were happy with until the 1994 &#8220;b-sides session&#8221; produced the track that was released as a flip on &#8220;Undone&#8221;.</p>
<p>Tragically, in 1997, Mykel and Carli were killed &#8211; along with their younger sister Trista &#8211; in a car crash on the way from a Weezer show in Colorado. Naturally, the song &#8211; originally just a touching gift from Rivers to his friends &#8211; has taken on a much more mythical status since then, most powerfully demonstrated by this <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-ou0kL-Iuw">incredibly moving solo performance by Rivers</a> at a later benefit show for the sisters&#8217; family.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve left for last what is undoubtedly my favourite of the early B-sides &#8211; and, in fact, one of my favourite Weezer songs of all. It&#8217;s also the song that&#8217;s pretty much responsible for my getting into the band in the first place &#8211; since, although I bought and loved &#8220;Buddy Holly&#8221; back in 1994, I&#8217;d never actually listened to the album until the summer of 2000, when I picked it up at a reduced price (in a record shop in the Dutch town of Delft) on the offchance it might have &#8220;Susanne&#8221; on it. It didn&#8217;t &#8211; but naturally I loved it anyway, and the rest is history.</p>
<p>Why did I want to hear &#8220;Susanne&#8221; again so badly? Because I&#8217;d heard it over the closing credits of Kevin Smith&#8217;s <em>Mallrats</em>, and it was absolutely bloody fantastic. One of the band&#8217;s customarily brilliant forays into a 6/8 time signature,<sup><a href="#fn4">4</a></sup> and another tribute to a helpful friend (this time a particularly dedicated A&amp;R rep at Geffen) it&#8217;s outstandingly, ridiculously melodic (with harmonies drawn from Rivers&#8217; love of the Beach Boys), and life-affirmingly joyous. There are actually two versions &#8211; the original was used as one of the &#8220;Undone&#8221; b-sides, but the song was remixed (and beefed-up/improved considerably) for use in <em>Mallrats</em>. Here it be:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/06/weezerology-part-one-into-the-blue/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p>Listening back to the first couple of years of Weezer&#8217;s output in order is an undeniably pleasant experience. The band had a clearly defined sound and style, were bursting with creativity &#8211; if sounding a <em>little</em> samey on a track-to-track basis &#8211; and just about everything they played burst forth with unfettered joy. They were confident in their own musicality, and yet endearingly awkward and unassuming figures at the same time. In short, they were a band it was very, very easy to fall in love with. And a band you could never imagine falling <em>out</em> of love with.</p>
<p>Oh, how little we knew.</p>
<p><em>Weezerology will continue with Part Two, <strong>The Butterfly Effect</strong>&#8230; soon.</em></p>
<div class="fnote">
<p><a name="fn1"></a><sup>1</sup>Although Cropper had played on early tracks of the Blue Album recording sessions, the official line is that he does not appear on the album. His guitar playing remains on the earlier-recorded b-side &#8220;Jamie&#8221;, however; and by virtue of having composed the intro section he has a co-writing credit on &#8220;My Name Is Jonas&#8221;.</p>
<p><a name="fn2"></a><sup>2</sup>Originally intended to be a scrambled compilation of movie and similar quotes, akin to The Avalanches&#8217; &#8220;Frontier Psychiatrist&#8221;, but replaced when getting various rights became an issue with a recording from a party the band attended. Both snippets feature long-time webmaster, roadie and all-round &#8220;fifth Weezer&#8221; Karl Koch: in the first, he&#8217;s talking to Matt Sharp, and in the second, Mykel Allan. The original intended samples can be heard on a demo of the song that&#8217;s floating around online.</p>
<p><a name="fn3"></a><sup>3</sup>The first such tribute to her, but not the last: Matt Sharp wrote the song &#8220;Mrs Young&#8221; for his side project band The Rentals, and originally demoed it with Rivers guesting on shared vocals. Ultimately, the original lyrics were scrapped and the song was reworked into &#8220;Please Let That Be You&#8221;, for the 1995 album &#8220;Return of the Rentals&#8221;.</p>
<p><a name="fn4"></a><sup>4</sup>Or so I gather. I&#8217;m not up enough on my musical theory to differentiate between 3/4, 6/8 etc.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/06/weezerology-part-one-into-the-blue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weezerology: An Introduction</title>
		<link>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/06/weezerology-an-introduction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/06/weezerology-an-introduction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 12:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seb Patrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bloggery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weezerology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/?p=765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WHAT? A blog-based listening project that will involve going through (just about) every single Weezer song, in chronological order, and charting the evolution (or, in some cases, devolution) of the band&#8217;s songwriting and recording styles. WHY? My favourite band for over a decade, Weezer continue to fascinate me even as they continue their slide towards being one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-766" title="Weezerology" src="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/weezerology.jpg" alt="" width="477" height="261" /><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>WHAT?</strong> A blog-based listening project that will involve going through (just about) every single Weezer song, in chronological order, and charting the evolution (or, in some cases, devolution) of the band&#8217;s songwriting and recording styles.</p>
<p><strong>WHY?</strong> My favourite band for over a decade, Weezer continue to fascinate me even as they continue their slide towards being one of the music industry&#8217;s biggest running jokes. Their recent recording output has been baffling, bizarre and &#8211; in the main &#8211; borderline unlistenable, yet there&#8217;s something about them that means they can never wholly be written off, and even the worst albums contain nuggets of merit. I want to examine why that is, as well as looking at why and how they&#8217;ve got to this stage in the first place. I also find it fascinating to look at the surprisingly high number of &#8220;albums that never were&#8221;, and compare them with the official eight albums that have seen release.</p>
<p><strong>HOW? </strong>Rather than taking each song on a detailed one-by-one basis (it&#8217;s been done, and with over 150 songs to get through it&#8217;d take bloody <em>ages</em>), I&#8217;ll look at blocks of songs in separated &#8220;eras&#8221; &#8211; each centred around a particular album but also taking in things that might have gone on in the year or so either side of it.</p>
<p><strong>WHEN? </strong>Part one, spanning the band&#8217;s earliest demos and debut <em>The Blue Album</em>, will go up at some point in the next couple of weeks. After that&#8230; periodic, depending on how quickly I get through them and (especially) how depressed I get around the time of <em>Raditude</em>. Monthly, maybe?</p>
<p>I hope it&#8217;ll be interesting &#8211; especially for those of you who actually like the band, but maybe for some of you who don&#8217;t as well. I&#8217;ll try and include song links here and there so that readers who don&#8217;t know the material I&#8217;m talking about can sample the important bits. And if you <em>are</em> interested, below the jump is the full list of songs I&#8217;ll be tackling&#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-765"></span></p>
<p><strong>Kitchen Tapes &amp; Blue Demos</strong><br />
Thief, You’ve Taken All That Was Me<br />
Let’s Sew Our Pants Together<br />
Paperface<br />
Lullabye for Wayne</p>
<p><strong>The Blue Album</strong><br />
My Name Is Jonas<br />
No-One Else<br />
The World Has Turned And Left Me Here<br />
Buddy Holly<br />
Undone<br />
Surf Wax America<br />
Say It Ain’t So<br />
In The Garage<br />
Holiday<br />
Only In Dreams</p>
<p><strong>Blue Album B-Sides</strong><br />
Mykel and Carli<br />
Susanne<br />
Jamie<br />
My Evaline</p>
<p><strong>Songs From The Black Hole (Rivers Demos)</strong><br />
Blast Off!<br />
Who You Callin’ Bitch?<br />
Oh Jonas<br />
Please Remember<br />
Come to My Pod<br />
Oh No This Is Not For Me<br />
Superfriend<br />
She’s Had A Girl<br />
Dude, We’re Finally Landing (Good News!)<br />
What Is This I Find?<br />
Now I Finally See<br />
You Won’t Get With Me Tonight<br />
Longtime Sunshine</p>
<p><strong>Pinkerton</strong><br />
Tired of Sex<br />
Getchoo<br />
No Other One<br />
Why Bother?<br />
Across the Sea<br />
The Good Life<br />
El Scorcho<br />
Pink Triangle<br />
Falling For You<br />
Butterfly</p>
<p><strong>Pinkerton B-Sides/Miscellany</strong><br />
You Gave Your Love To Me Softly<br />
Devotion<br />
Waiting On You<br />
I Just Threw Out The Love Of My Dreams<br />
Getting Up and Leaving<br />
I Swear It’s True<br />
Tragic Girl</p>
<p><strong>Hiatus Tracks</strong><br />
American Girls<br />
Velouria<br />
Everyone<br />
Trampoline</p>
<p><strong>Summer Songs 2000</strong><br />
O Girl<br />
On the Edge<br />
Preacher’s Son<br />
Superstar<br />
The Sister Song<br />
Too Late To Try<br />
My Brain</p>
<p><strong>The Green Album</strong><br />
Don’t Let Go<br />
Photograph<br />
Hash Pipe<br />
Island in the Sun<br />
Crab<br />
Knock-Down Drag-Out<br />
Smile<br />
Simple Pages<br />
Glorious Day<br />
O Girlfriend<br />
I Do</p>
<p><strong>Green Album B-Sides</strong><br />
Teenage Victory Song<br />
Oh, Lisa<br />
Always<br />
Sugar Booger<br />
Brightening Day<br />
Starlight</p>
<p><strong>The Alternative Maladroit (2001/2002 demos)</strong><br />
Ain’t Got Much Time<br />
Serendipity<br />
Broken Arrows<br />
Don’t Pick On Me<br />
Listen Up<br />
Zep Song<br />
Your Room<br />
Mr Taxman<br />
Porcupine<br />
How Long<br />
Change The World<br />
Saturday Night<br />
High Up Above<br />
Sandwiches Time<br />
We Go Together<br />
Puerta Vallarta</p>
<p><strong>Maladroit</strong><br />
American Gigolo<br />
Dope Nose<br />
Keep Fishin’<br />
Take Control<br />
Death and Destruction<br />
Slob<br />
Burndt Jamb<br />
Space Rock<br />
Slave<br />
Fall Together<br />
Possibilities<br />
Love Explosion<br />
December<br />
Living Without You</p>
<p><strong>Album 5 Demos</strong><br />
Mo’ Beats<br />
Private Message<br />
Misstep<br />
Booby Trap<br />
Modern Dukes<br />
Untenable<br />
Fontana<br />
She Who Is Militant<br />
Prodigy Lover<br />
Mansion of Cardboard<br />
Queen of Earth<br />
Hey Domingo<br />
The Organ Player<br />
Sacrifice<br />
Mad Kow<br />
Running Man<br />
367<br />
The Victor<br />
Acapulco<br />
Lullaby</p>
<p><strong>Make Believe</strong><br />
Beverly Hills<br />
Perfect Situation<br />
This Is Such A Pity<br />
Hold Me<br />
Peace<br />
We Are All On Drugs<br />
The Damage In Your Heart<br />
Pardon Me<br />
My Best Friend<br />
The Other Way<br />
Freak Me Out<br />
Haunt You Every Day</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;The Fallen Soldiers&#8221;</strong><br />
I Don’t Want Your Loving<br />
Blowin’ My Stack<br />
Losing My Mind<br />
I’m A Robot</p>
<p><strong>Pre-Red Album</strong><br />
Turning Up The Radio<br />
The Odd Couple<br />
Autopilot</p>
<p><strong>The Red Album</strong><br />
Troublemaker<br />
The Greatest Man That Ever Lived<br />
Pork and Beans<br />
Heart Songs<br />
Everybody Get Dangerous<br />
Dreamin’<br />
Thought I Knew<br />
Cold Dark World<br />
Automatic<br />
The Angel and the One</p>
<p><strong>Red Album Bonus &amp; Miscellany</strong><br />
Miss Sweeney<br />
Pig<br />
The Spider<br />
King<br />
It’s Easy<br />
I Can Love</p>
<p><strong>Raditude</strong><br />
(If You’re Wondering if I Want You To) I Want You To<br />
I’m Your Daddy<br />
The Girl Got Hot<br />
Can’t Stop Partying<br />
Put Me Back Together<br />
Tripping Down the Freeway<br />
Love is the Answer<br />
Let It All Hang Out<br />
In the Mall<br />
I Don’t Want To Let You Go</p>
<p><strong>Raditude Bonus &amp; Miscellany</strong><br />
Get Me Some<br />
Run Over By A Truck<br />
The Prettiest Girl In The Whole Wide World<br />
The Underdogs<br />
Turn Me Round<br />
The Story of My Life<br />
I Hear Bells<br />
Represent</p>
<p><strong>Hurley</strong><br />
Memories<br />
Ruling Me<br />
Trainwrecks<br />
Unspoken<br />
Where’s My Sex?<br />
Run Away<br />
Hang On<br />
Smart Girls<br />
Brave New World<br />
Time Flies</p>
<p>Finally, a few quick notes for people who might actually know what I&#8217;m on about:</p>
<ul>
<li>With the exception of the Rivers SFTBH demos (included due to their importance), this is full-band material only. No solo stuff or side projects &#8211; no Rentals, no Space Twins, no Special Goodness. You may note that Homie have snuck in there, though. We&#8217;ll discuss that when I come to it.</li>
<li>No covers, either. This is about Weezer&#8217;s songs only.</li>
<li>Wherever possible I&#8217;ve tried to include every song for which either an official release or a leaked (officially or unofficially) demo has occurred. There may be one or two I&#8217;ve missed here and there, or not been able to get hold of for some reason. There are of course <em>countless</em> songs that the band have written and recorded that we&#8217;ve never heard, however.</li>
<li>Some songs have found their way into multiple recording sessions over the years, but I&#8217;ve only ever included each song once. Priority is always given to an official album release. With demos, the version from the latest &#8220;era&#8221; is used &#8211; if there are multiple recordings in an era, I&#8217;ve just gone with the version I like best. This explains why, for example, the only songs listed under SS2K are the ones that weren&#8217;t carried over to later sessions.</li>
<li>Some demo compilations have specifically been put together in &#8220;album&#8221;-style tracklisting by me. Again, we&#8217;ll discuss those when we get to them.</li>
</ul>
<p>See you later this month for part one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/06/weezerology-an-introduction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WSC #304</title>
		<link>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/05/wsc-304/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/05/wsc-304/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 12:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seb Patrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[When Saturday Comes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/?p=699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Would you like to write us a Liverpool fan&#8217;s perspective on Alan Davies&#8217; comments re Hillsborough and the subsequent fallout?&#8221; they said. I did have a few things I wanted to say about the matter, so I said &#8220;Alright&#8221;, while also thinking &#8220;Christ, I hope he doesn&#8217;t end up reading it and shouting at me [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/wsc304.jpg" rel="lightbox[699]"><img class="alignleft  wp-image-700" title="wsc304" src="http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/wsc304-211x300.jpg" alt="" width="127" height="180" /></a>&#8220;Would you like to write us a Liverpool fan&#8217;s perspective on Alan Davies&#8217; comments re Hillsborough and the subsequent fallout?&#8221; they said. I did have a few things I wanted to say about the matter, so I said &#8220;Alright&#8221;, while also thinking &#8220;Christ, I hope he doesn&#8217;t end up reading it and shouting at me on Twitter, though.&#8221;</p>
<p>Anyway, I wrote it &#8211; sneaking in a <em>Doctor Who</em> reference in the process - and <a href="http://www.wsc.co.uk/content/view/8567/38/">the magazine is now out in shops</a> (as well as being available to order online). I don&#8217;t think I was especially hysterical or excessively critical, and I refrained from making personal attacks against Davies (who I think was misguided rather than downright evil) himself. Although I did sort of slightly, possibly, a little bit, compare him to Richard Littlejohn.</p>
<p>I hope he doesn&#8217;t end up reading it and shouting at me on Twitter, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sebpatrick.co.uk/blog/2012/05/wsc-304/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
